No.3485
>>3482To be completely honest, even though this is both sharper and the audio is better i prefer
>>3481 because of the "darker" look of it.
No.3487
>>3485Doing direct comparisons: the DVD is blue tinted and may be the fading of cyan and yellow dyes, while the BD does color correction to counter this.
>Since the introduction of modern color motion picture films in the 1950s (the older Technicolor process is a different story), color fading has become a growing concern. Color fading is caused by spontaneous chemical changes in the image dyes of color films. Many older films have taken on a distinct purplish cast, caused by the rapid fading of the cyan and yellow image dyes. https://www.filmpreservation.org/preservation-basics/color-dye-fading No.3488
>>3486The guys suit was green in the bluray one but black in the dvd one.
Same with the guys hair and eyebrows in the beginning.
Its been decades since i watched dirty pair i dont know which is correct here.
No.3489
Did the OP too for the hell of it. The BD release has far cleaner audio, but it also sounds heavily brickwalled. Both also seemingly have far different shadow detail. The DVD seems far darker in places while the BD seems to lift shadows considerably. Then the BD might also crush shadow detail in other spots.
>>3488I thought that was odd too. The DVD feels very blue, but the BD is green. Some pretty big color changes.
No.3544
>>3492What is the intention here with that release with the missiles with removing the shadows, To make it look more flat like modern anime?
Yeah i can see the details more but in real life shadows and twilight exist and some detail isnt intended to be seen..
No.3575
>>3574So, .opus does work with .webm. Good to know.