Tuned in to Post 2K Anime / Manga!

Sort of. Remember that it was made by NEETs for NEETs, so unless you're a NEET with suicidal inclinations, you won't understand/appreciate even a half of it.

>>839
I'm not a NEET and I liked it because it was a fun dark comedy with fun lovable characters.

>>841
That's because you watched anime. Try manga. It's pointless anyway if you can't relate. "Fun"? My ass. Every second show is "fun". It's like appreciating Lucky Star because Konata is cute and silly.

yeah, it's a masterpiece.

Seen it when I was in school. I guess it predicted my timeline. Never though I'll end up as NEET on imageboards, worrying about very real conspiracies.
NHK ni yokoso also does expose sects, cults, marketing pyramids and other social phenomena

Also a great cultural artwork before invention of soyjack degradation

the protoagonist 'got saved' by getting hired and was able to find a job. Oh boy, I've tried to get at least average or even low pay job. the competition is insane against people who'll work for pennies.

>>Lucky Star
that is for newf*g. it always has been.
real men watch azumanga.

>>842
The manga was fun as well. Perhaps you should trying having fun yourself…? Trust me it's fun.

>>846
Fun is denied to me. I suffer perpetually.

>>835
nhk suffers from a similar problem as many western works wherein the author attempts to depict some aspect of reality by divorcing their own neuroses and pathologies from the depiction (seeking to create an 'objective' view of the phenomenon in question), and fails due to subconscious leakage of their own pathology into the work. the fact that the author is a nervous hikki wreck who hates himself detracts from the experience of the ln and show, because he's not really able to portray neetdom in a fair light, and he pretends as though the unfair light he shines on it is somehow unbiased. it's not a bad show, but this has always annoyed me to some extent.

>>851
>objective
>objective work of art
did he have to make a documentary

>>852
the point is that it's framed as objective when obviously any look at hikki/neet life will be tainted by the perspective of the author

>>851
Does "objective" even exist?
everyone have their own personal point of view, lens, angle, unique expirience.
Maybe, just maybe, some folk are different. Maybe wizchan does better job at representing. Who knows?

Anime hadn't enough wojacks to become popular in West.

>>853
I don't want to be mean, but this seems like a pointless viewpoint to have. Art is personal, obviously it's not going to be objective the way the structure of a cell or laws of physics are objective.

>>857
>>854
i genuinely don't understand what in my post has made multiple people misunderstand it. maybe i'm a bad communicator.

my point is (please read the following lines carefully) that welcome to the nhk presents itself as an objective framing of neet/hikki life when it is tainted by the perspective of the author. i have no issue with art taking a subjective viewpoint in it's addressal of certain issues, the problem comes when the writer or artist claims that this subjective viewpoint is reflective of the objective truth, when it's clearly not. nhk does this, which is why i dislike it.

>nhk does this
quote?

>>860
how or when does it take the objective standpoint? doesn't it, by being shown from the perspective of Sato, whose very first scene is him indulging in a delusional fantasy, if anything suggest the opposite?

This is a dumb argument, the author wrote about his experience as a hikki/neet its written from experience.
If you enjoy work made not from first hand experience im sure there are others out there that you may enjoy.

>This is a dumb argument
just for a second there i forgot this is an imageboard