Tuned in to Retro Anime / Manga!

the ova is retro and the manga up to before 2000 is retro.

Huh, the OVA is older than I remember it being. I thought it was mid 90s or even later. People also seem to forget that the second part of the OVA (that adapted the first half of part 3) started releasing in 2000. So if you want to be a stickler you can only talk about half of the OVA adaptation.

Never really liked Jojo. Always found it a bit dull.

>>4072
Why do Japanese love vilifying blond people?

>having in mind it originally became an anime back in 1993, even if its most famous version is the one from the 2000s.
The 2000s episodes are not the ones people actually refer to that often when people discuss the OVA episodes though as people mostly focus on the DIO fight which were the episodes produced in the 90s. Yes the series was effectively made in reverse production order, and this is a lot more obvious when you see that the episodes which are first chronologically are clearly digital.

Anyway, Y2k is the cut off, so I think discussing the manga for every part up and including 5 should be fine so long as it is the actual manga along with the N'doul, D'arby, and DIO episodes of the OVA. Even if by this point Jojo is something that people don't really think of as being retro that much from what I can tell in the jojo centric places. If anything discussing each part in its actual context during serialization would be one of the more interesting aspects to bring up.

>>4376
The most interesting thing during the serialization of part 2 was a fan actually sent an angry letter to Araki for retconning the fact that Zeppli didn't have any kids to be able to have a grandson like Caesar. The original jump magazine versions had it be that he stated that he had no children